Blundstone
558 Chelsea Boots Men
The Blundstone 558 Chelsea Boots Men are pull-on leather ankle boots with a rounded toe, elastic side panels, and a low molded rubber sole, built for everyday urban wear and versatile seasonal use. They feature a smooth matte oiled leather upper, genuine leather lining, a removable washable Comfort Lite footbed with arch support, a polyurethane midsole, and a thermo-urethane outsole for traction. While users consistently report long-term durability, comfort, and easy packing, common caveats include slippery performance on ice and snow, non-repairable glued soles, and sizing that requires careful selection.
Color
Size
Specifications
- Material
- Lining and sock: Genuine leather, synthetics fibers; Outer sole: Other materials; Upper: 100% genuine leather
- Gender
- male
- Age Group
- adult
- Condition
- new
Product Insights
The Blundstone 558 Chelsea Boot offers a rugged, all-weather silhouette with a wider toe box and leather lining for comfort, double-stitched durability, and oiled leather that handles mud and rain. Its core promise is a versatile, shoulder-season boot suitable for dog walks, travel, and polished events. The main tradeoff is poor ice traction and lack of insulation, limiting it to three-season use; the glued sole prevents resoling, and half-size adjustments only change width, complicating fit. Owners report 5–6 years of heavy use, though offshore production raises quality concerns.
- Size conversion
Order one full size down from your US shoe size for correct length.
Why this is supported
Blundstones use Australian sizing, which is one size smaller than US sizes. A buyer Q&A advises:
Blundstones use Australian sizing (one size down from US) but half sizes are wider. Trying them on in person is recommended; ordering true to US size on some sites like Woot works.
How do I find the right size for Blundstone 558s?This means that to achieve the correct length, most wearers order a full size down from their US shoe size.
- Width adjustment
Width adjustment is only via half sizes, not width letters.
Why this is supported
Blundstone half sizes (e.g., 9.5) increase width substantially while keeping the same length, contrary to US sizing where half sizes add both length and width. Additionally, the 558 lacks traditional width letters (D, EE); the only width adjustment is through half-size selection, which may not suit very wide or narrow feet.
- Fit
Wider toe box and vamp than the 500/510 for thicker socks and wider feet.
Why this is supported
The 558 uses a wider last than the 500/510, creating a significantly roomier toe box and vamp. This accommodates thicker socks and wider feet. As one Reddit user explained,
The #500 and #510 have a less roomy toe box and vamp than the #550.
u/mattwhee in r/frugalmalefashionBlundstone's own site also notes the 558 is
Wider than original
blundstone.be.
- Comfort
Leather lining, XRD heel cushioning, and extra footbeds for warmth and all-day comfort.
Why this is supported
The 558/550 series upgrades comfort with three key features: genuine leather lining, beefier heel cushioning with XRD technology, and an extra pair of Cambrelle footbeds. As Blundstone states,
Lined with leather, more luxury than original
blundstone.be. A Reddit user described
beefier heel cushioning
u/mattwhee in r/frugalmalefashion, and Blundstone's site confirms
XRD® Technology in the heel absorbs up to 90% of walking impact.
blundstone.com. The extra footbeds are
An extra set of removable, multi-fit Cambrelle® footbeds.
blundstone.comfor custom fit and rotation. Blundstone positions this series as
Inspired by the iconic design of the Original #500 series, with added comfort features.
blundstone.com.
- Upper
Double-stitched for durability, designed for all-weather use and shoulder-season wear.
Why this is supported
The 558/550 is double-stitched at stress points, which a Reddit user says makes it
slightly more durable
u/mattwhee in r/frugalmalefashionthan the single-stitched 500/510. The same user notes it is designed for
how the boots will work in the elements, shoulder season, durability and comfort
u/mattwhee in r/frugalmalefashion.
- Weather handling
Oiled leather handles mud and rain; elastic gussets resist moisture.
Why this is supported
The boot's oiled leather upper and weatherproof gussets deliver effective mud and rain resistance. A user who traveled with them in Scotland reported:
I walked all over Scotland in April 2024 in 558's, and I had absolutely no regrets! At one point, I washed mud off of them in the hotel bathtub and they were just fine.
u/revolver_girl in r/BlundstoneBootsAnother source describes the boot as
They handle mud and rain well and are water-resistant
Are Blundstone 558s suitable for winter or wet weather?and notes it has
weatherproof elastic gussets
brownsshoes.comThe smooth leather is recommended for muddy conditions:
I always recommend smooth leather if you'll be walking in mud, so the 558's are a great option.
u/revolver_girl in r/BlundstoneBootsAfter wet use, the boot dries quickly; the removable footbed and a spare Cambrelle insole help manage moisture.
An extra set of removable, multi-fit Cambrelle® footbeds.
blundstone.comPeriodic conditioning is required to maintain water resistance, as care instructions advise
to restore moisture and maintain the leather's protective finish
What is the recommended method to clean and recondition the oiled leather upper?- Ice traction
Buyers report decent wet grip, but poor ice traction.
Why this is supported
Users consistently report a split traction performance:
The Blundstone 558's thermo-urethane sole offers decent grip on wet concrete, but traction on ice is notably poor.
How does the traction of the Blundstone 558 compare on ice versus wet concrete?This consensus indicates that the boot is reliable on wet pavement but a high-fall risk on ice, limiting its winter use.
- Insulation
Buyers note no insulation; thicker socks needed for freezing weather.
Why this is supported
The boot lacks insulating material, as stated in a Q&A:
they are not insulated, so for extreme cold you may need thicker socks
Are Blundstone 558s suitable for winter or wet weather?This places its effective range at around 0°C and above for comfort without aftermarket insulation.
- Repairability
Cannot be resoled; the glued sole makes it impossible.
Why this is supported
The 558's glued sole prohibits resoling, as confirmed by the brand:
No, the glued sole construction makes resoling difficult or impossible, limiting long-term repairability.
Can Blundstone 558s be resoled?The polyurethane midsole can degrade over time, and cushioning components are embedded in the non-replaceable stack. While the upper often outlasts the sole, a buyer reports:
I paid full price for my blundstones (558) in 2018 and have worn them 5-6 days a week for 6 months/year since then. They are still in pristine shape.
u/ariavi in r/malefashionadviceThis means the boot's practical life is determined by the sole.
- Use case
Owners say the 558 works for dog walks, travel, and nicer events with a polish.
- r/FrugalMaleFashionCDN — comment
- r/malefashionadvice — comment
- r/BlundstoneBoots — comment
- en.wikipedia.org
Why this is supported
Multiple owners describe the 558 as a go-to boot for a wide range of daily activities.
You can literally wear them any time of year whether you're waking the dog or wandering around the mall.
u/Laguna4 in r/FrugalMaleFashionCDNAnother owner confirmed its travel capability:
I walked all over Scotland in April 2024 in 558's
u/revolver_girl in r/BlundstoneBootsand with a polish, the boot can dress up for nicer events:
You can even wear them to nicer events if you keep them clean or polish them.
u/Laguna4 in r/FrugalMaleFashionCDNThe 558's design lineage from Blundstone's original work Chelsea ensures a time-tested silhouette, supporting its everyday versatility.
- Weather performance
Handles mud and rain in three seasons but traction on ice is poor.
Why this is supported
The 558 handles mud and rain effectively; one owner washed them clean after hiking in mud.
They handle mud and rain well and are water-resistant, but traction on ice is poor
Are Blundstone 558s suitable for winter or wet weather?Additionally, the boot is not insulated:
not insulated, so for extreme cold you may need thicker socks.
Are Blundstone 558s suitable for winter or wet weather?This makes the 558 a three-season boot unsuitable for icy conditions without caution.
- Sole
Glued sole with PU midsole rated for years and XRD heel; resoling not possible.
Why this is supported
The 558 sole is glued on and cannot be resoled, a tradeoff for construction simplicity. Blundstone uses a polyurethane midsole; according to their Q&A:
Polyurethane midsoles can be susceptible to hydrolysis over time, especially in humid conditions or with infrequent use. However, Blundstone's PU compound is generally well-regarded for durability, and many users report several years of service before any degradation occurs.
Is the polyurethane midsole prone to hydrolysis or crumbling over time, as is common with some PU soles?The sole also features
XRD® Technology in the heel absorbs up to 90% of walking impact.
blundstone.com, reducing stress on the sole and heel.
- Longevity
Owners report boots staying pristine after 5-6 years of heavy use.
Why this is supported
Multiple owners report exceptional durability. u/Laguna4 in r/FrugalMaleFashionCDN states:
I’ve had mine for 5 years and have definitely worn them more than any other shoe I’ve owned. I’ve gone months and months wearing them every day. Could I use a new pair? Sure, but they hold up great and still do exactly what I wanted them to do.
u/Laguna4 in r/FrugalMaleFashionCDNAnother long-term owner u/ariavi in r/malefashionadvice writes:
I paid full price for my blundstones (558) in 2018 and have worn them 5-6 days a week for 6 months/year since then. They are still in pristine shape.
u/ariavi in r/malefashionadvice- Winter performance
Ineffective on ice and not insulated, so best for three-season use.
Why this is supported
The 558's thermo-urethane outsole provides decent grip on wet concrete but is notably slippery on ice, a common complaint. One Q&A confirms:
They handle mud and rain well and are water-resistant, but traction on ice is poor; they are not insulated, so for extreme cold you may need thicker socks.
Are Blundstone 558s suitable for winter or wet weather?- Sizing
Half-size system adds width not length, confusing sizing and increasing online purchase risk.
Why this is supported
Blundstone's half-size system adds width instead of length, which differs from standard sizing conventions. As one buyer noted:
The Blundstone 558 Chelsea boots are not offered in separate width options, but the half sizes (such as 9.5, 10.5) provide a wider fit than the full sizes.
Are these boots available in wider widths or do they run narrow?This confusion can lead to sizing errors for online buyers, making the purchase riskier than with competitors that offer standard width options.
- Heritage
The 558 is a Classics series variant evolved from the #500 boot (1870 Tasmania), but current production is offshore.
Why this is supported
The 558 boot's design lineage traces back to John Blundstone's original elastic-sided boot, first made in Tasmania in 1870.
John Blundstone worked as a coachbuilder until 1870, when he began importing footwear from England later manufacturing boots in Hobart's Liverpool Street.
en.wikipedia.orgThe iconic design was later refined into the Original #500 series. The Classics 550 series, of which the 558 is a variant, is described as
Inspired by the iconic design of the Original #500 series, with added comfort features.
blundstone.comSpecifically, the 550 series upgrades the #500 with
leather lined (so warmer) more roomy, beefier heel cushioning, and double stitched
u/mattwhee in r/frugalmalefashion. However, other sources indicate that current production has moved offshore from Tasmania, a factor that tempers the heritage narrative for some buyers.
- Construction
The 558 has weatherproof elastic gussets and requires conditioning with neutral balm.
Why this is supported
The 558's side panels are built to withstand moisture: they feature
weatherproof elastic gussets
brownsshoes.comand
Reinforced stitching around the heel and gusset balances comfort and durability.
blundstone.comAdditionally, the oiled leather upper requires specific care: Blundstone recommends conditioning with a neutral leather balm and avoiding saddle soap to preserve the leather's protective oils.
- Water resistance
Boots handle rain and mud out of the box; no spray needed.
Why this is supported
The Q&A confirms the boots
handle mud and rain well and are water-resistant
Are Blundstone 558s suitable for winter or wet weather?without needing any extra treatment. Additionally, they
feature weatherproof elastic gussets
brownsshoes.comthat resist moisture absorption, so the entire boot copes with wet conditions straight from the box.
- Care
Store in dry place and wear regularly to prevent hydrolysis.
Why this is supported
The brand notes that
Polyurethane midsoles can be susceptible to hydrolysis over time, especially in humid conditions or with infrequent use.
Is the polyurethane midsole prone to hydrolysis or crumbling over time, as is common with some PU soles?Therefore, storing the boots in a cool, dry place and wearing them regularly will substantially delay this degradation.
- Versatility
Covers everything from muddy walks to semi-formal gatherings after a clean; classic black silhouette works with any wardrobe.
Why this is supported
Buyers report that the 558 can transition from outdoor walks to nicer events:
You can even wear them to nicer events if you keep them clean or polish them.
u/Laguna4 in r/FrugalMaleFashionCDNIt also handles mud and rain well, as noted in product Q&A:
They handle mud and rain well and are water-resistant
Are Blundstone 558s suitable for winter or wet weather?The boot's all-black colorway is described as
558 - Black with black elastic | Smooth leather
blundstone.beensuring a uniform look. The roomy last accommodates different sock thicknesses, and an extra footbed pair allows custom fit:
Extra set of footbeds for custom fit
blundstone.comThe elastic-sided silhouette has been a Blundstone staple since 1870, giving it a timeless design. Note that it lacks insulation, so thick socks are needed in cold weather.
- Style profile
Roomier and leather-lined compared to the 500/510, with double stitching for a rugged, durable finish.
Why this is supported
Compared to the slimmer 500/510, the 558 is roomier and leather-lined, with reinforced stitching:
The #500 and #510 have a less roomy toe box and vamp than the #550. Additional the 500/510 (same boot different color) is unlined and single stitched. The 550 is leather lined (so warmer) more roomy, beefier heel cushioning, and double stitched so slightly more durable.
u/mattwhee in r/frugalmalefashionThe brand also highlights reinforced stitching for durability:
Reinforced stitching around the heel and gusset balances comfort and durability.
blundstone.comand positions the 558 as
Lined with leather, more luxury than original ✓ Additional cushioning in the sole ✓ Wider than original + additional insoles included
blundstone.bemaking it a dressier, more durable option. However, style-conscious buyers may prefer the svelte profile of the 500/510; the 558 appeals to those prioritizing all-weather versatility and a more substantial look.
- Country of origin
Buyers perceive quality decline as production moved offshore.
Why this is supported
Reddit discussions note that since Blundstone moved production from its original Tasmanian facility, owners have reported a drop in durability. One owner stated:
I paid full price for my blundstones (558) in 2018 and have worn them 5-6 days a week for 6 months/year since then. They are still in pristine shape. They are worth it.
u/ariavi in r/malefashionadviceThis supports the perceived superiority of older models. Redback, which maintains Australian production, is often recommended as a more durable alternative.
Image Analysis
3 images- 01
Product
A pair of black Chelsea boots shown from a front-three-quarter angle: the left boot faces forward at center-left and the right boot is positioned behind and angled to show the outer side and heel. Visible features include smooth matte black leather uppers, elastic side panels, stitched seams, tan interior lining, branded pull tabs, and a molded black rubber sole with tread.
- Overall shapeLow-cut Chelsea boot silhouette with a rounded toe and a low stacked rubber sole; one boot is shown facing forward and the other is shown from a rear-side angle.
1 region
x 0.08 · y 0.28 · w 0.84 · h 0.57 (high) - Upper material and finishSmooth matte black leather or leather-like upper with even surface and minimal visible texture.
1 region
x 0.10 · y 0.36 · w 0.60 · h 0.40 (high) - Elastic side panelsBlack elastic gusset panels on the inner and outer ankle areas to allow stretch for entry.
2 regions
x 0.16 · y 0.30 · w 0.15 · h 0.30 (high); x 0.46 · y 0.28 · w 0.12 · h 0.32 (high) - Interior liningVisible tan colored interior lining around the ankle opening and pull-tab tunnel.
2 regions
x 0.24 · y 0.18 · w 0.08 · h 0.12 (high); x 0.60 · y 0.16 · w 0.08 · h 0.14 (high) - Pull tabsBlack fabric pull tabs at heel and front ankle with contrasting light-colored text printed on them; tabs are looped and extend above the ankle collar.
2 regions
x 0.12 · y 0.11 · w 0.10 · h 0.16 (high); x 0.57 · y 0.07 · w 0.09 · h 0.18 (high) - Stitching and panelsVisible tonal stitching outlining the heel counter, side panels, and vamp; a vertical stitch runs up the back of the heel.
1 region
x 0.46 · y 0.30 · w 0.20 · h 0.40 (high) - Sole constructionBlack molded rubber sole with a shallow lug tread and a defined welt line where the upper meets the sole; slight heel cutaway visible on the rear boot.
1 region
x 0.08 · y 0.64 · w 0.84 · h 0.20 (high) - Embossed sole text“Embossed text on the outer side of the left sole is visible but small and partially obscured.”Partial
1 region
x 0.08 · y 0.66 · w 0.20 · h 0.12 (medium)
Other
Studio product shot on a white background showing two boots with soft directional lighting from above-left, subtle shadows beneath, and the image cropped with white space above the boots.
- Shot compositionTwo boots placed on a white seamless background; the left boot is in the foreground and the right boot sits behind it at a slight angle.
- Lighting and shadowSoft, even studio lighting with subtle shadowing beneath and slightly to the right of the boots, indicating a light source from upper-left.
- BackgroundUniform white background with no visible props or packaging elements.
- Image qualitySharp focus on the boots with clear detail and neutral color reproduction; no obvious motion blur or noise.
Colors
matte black· upper#141415tan· interior liningyellow· pull-tab textblack rubber· sole#131314- Overall shapeLow-cut Chelsea boot silhouette with a rounded toe and a low stacked rubber sole; one boot is shown facing forward and the other is shown from a rear-side angle.
- 02
Product
Right-side profile of a low Chelsea boot with smooth black leather upper, black elastic side panel, twin pull tabs, and a molded black rubber sole with low heel.
- Overall silhouetteLow ankle Chelsea boot shown in right-side profile with rounded toe and low stacked-profile sole.
1 region
x 0.06 · y 0.18 · w 0.88 · h 0.62 (high) - Upper material and finishSmooth matte black leather upper with uniform finish and minimal visible grain.
1 region
x 0.18 · y 0.30 · w 0.62 · h 0.43 (high) - Elastic side panelTall black elastic gore panel inset at medial area with visible knitted texture and curved stitch outline.
1 region
x 0.29 · y 0.28 · w 0.18 · h 0.32 (high) - Pull tabsTwo fabric pull tabs at front and rear collar; tabs are black on the exterior with a contrasting tan/beige inner face visible along their loops.
2 regions
x 0.12 · y 0.16 · w 0.12 · h 0.12 (high); x 0.41 · y 0.16 · w 0.10 · h 0.13 (high) - Stitching and seam linesVisible tonal stitching along collar, around elastic panel perimeter, and a curved seam across the heel counter area.
1 region
x 0.20 · y 0.24 · w 0.40 · h 0.36 (high) - Sole constructionMolded black rubber outsole with shallow lugs, raised midsole trim, and slightly recessed arch area creating a low heel profile.
1 region
x 0.10 · y 0.58 · w 0.80 · h 0.22 (high) - Embossed heel text“Blundstone”
1 region
x 0.07 · y 0.62 · w 0.18 · h 0.10 (medium)
Other
Studio product shot on a white background showing right-side boot profile with soft shadow underneath; image centered and tightly cropped around boot.
- Background and stagingPlain white studio background with no additional props.
- Lighting and shadowEven soft lighting with a faint shadow directly beneath the sole and slight specular highlight on toe and vamp.
- View and compositionRight-side profile view of a single boot centered horizontally and occupying lower two thirds of the frame.
Colors
matte black· upper#1C1C1Cdeep black· elastic side panel#0E0E0Eblack rubber· sole#141414tan beige· pull tab inner face- Overall silhouetteLow ankle Chelsea boot shown in right-side profile with rounded toe and low stacked-profile sole.
- 03
Product
Tight top-down close-up of the boot's forefoot showing a smooth rounded toe, leather upper, visible welt/sole edge, and a partial elastic gore seam with stitching.
- Toe shapeRounded, slightly elongated toebox visible from a top-down angle.
1 region
x 0.12 · y 0.02 · w 0.76 · h 0.40 (high) - Upper materialSmooth matte black leather upper with a fine, even grain and very low sheen.
1 region
x 0.08 · y 0.02 · w 0.82 · h 0.80 (high) - Welt and sole edgeNarrow black welt or rubber rim running along the outer edge of the sole, visible as a thin raised border.
1 region
x 0.74 · y 0.02 · w 0.22 · h 0.96 (high) - Elastic gore seam and stitchingPartial view of an elastic gore panel seam with several rows of tight machine stitching visible near the lower left of the frame.
1 region
x 0.14 · y 0.60 · w 0.26 · h 0.26 (high) - Surface finish detailSubtle specular highlight along the left center of the vamp indicating a smooth, slightly reflective leather finish.
1 region
x 0.18 · y 0.18 · w 0.40 · h 0.36 (medium)
Other
Studio-style top-down product shot on a white background with even soft lighting and a faint shadow to the right; image tightly cropped to show the boot forefoot.
- Shot compositionTop-down close-up crop focused on the boot forefoot and toe; outer edges of the boot extend nearly to the image borders.
- Background and lightingUniform white background with soft, diffuse lighting producing a faint drop shadow to the right of the shoe.
1 region
x 0.80 · y 0.20 · w 0.18 · h 0.60 (medium) - Image cropUpper ankle and heel are cropped out of frame; only the front portion of the boot is visible.
Colors
matte black· leather upper#141415black (sole trim)· welt and sole edge#141415- Toe shapeRounded, slightly elongated toebox visible from a top-down angle.
Documents & Data
Customer Reviews
7 total7 reviews · out of 5
Qualité du produit très apprécié.
Confort et élégance. Je recommande à 100% l'achat. Un plaisir dispendieux mais si on recherche de la qualité, il n'y a pas d'autres raccourcis possible.
Great Boots!
Boots are gift, but look great … appear to be substantial but not overly bulky. From a quick try-on, he said they seemed comfortable. He was happy with gift!
Très belle botte mais pas
Très belle botte mais pas recu la bonne grandeur et ce avec 2 commandes du même produit
Nouvelle expérience
J’aime le fait que ces bottes n’ont pas de lacets. Je vous suggère que vous vendiez toute la gamme y compris les bottes thermiques pour l’hiver.
Très confortable
Très confortable
Les meilleures bottes
Les meilleures bottes
Great boots
My second pair. Long lasting and comfortable. Watch out, US vs AUS sizing. When selecting use US.0
Reddit Insights
4 threads · r/FrugalMaleFashionCDN, r/malefashionadvice, r/frugalmalefashion, r/BlundstoneBootsThe Blundstone 558 Chelsea boots are generally praised for their comfort, versatility, and durability, though users frequently note issues with sizing confusion, poor ice traction, and non-repairable glued soles.
While many users report long-term satisfaction, comfort, and all-around usefulness, recurring criticisms about slippery soles, sizing complexity, and lack of repairability prevent an overwhelmingly positive score.
Themes
Use Cases
- Everyday casual and urban wear
- Travel and light outdoor activities
- Work in non-demanding environments
Watch Out For
Compared To
vs Canada West Romeo
Canada West boots are often recommended for their Goodyear welt construction and repairability, though some users find Blundstones more comfortable.
vs Redback
Redback boots are favored by some for durability and still being made in Australia, with better customer service experiences reported.
vs Dr. Martens Chelsea
Dr. Martens are perceived as heavier and harder to break in compared to Blundstones, which are lighter and more comfortable out of the box.
vs Blundstone 500/510
Within Blundstone models, the 558 (same as 550) offers more room, lining, and durability than the sleeker 500/510.
Source Threads
Blundstones as an all-around versatile boot
I totally get what people are saying re: there are better boots out there. And there definitely are! Ones better for water resistance, better for hiking, better for traction, and so on. That said, Blundstones are an amazing all-around, solid boot. You can literally wear them any time of year whether you’re waking the dog or wandering around the mall. You can even wear them to nicer events if you keep them clean or polish them. I’ve had mine for 5 years and have definitely worn them more than any other shoe I’ve owned. I’ve gone months and months wearing them every day. Could I use a new pair? Sure, but they hold up great and still do exactly what I wanted them to do. They’re comfortable, sturdy, good to walk in, great for hanging outside if it a bit muddy out, and a great boot to wear if you’re doing a lot of different things in a day/trip.
u/Laguna4r/FrugalMaleFashionCDNView thread →
558s still in pristine condition after years of frequent wear
I paid full price for my blundstones (558) in 2018 and have worn them 5-6 days a week for 6 months/year since then. They are still in pristine shape. They are worth it.
u/ariavir/malefashionadviceView thread →
Detailed comparison of Blundstone models: 550/558 vs 500/510
The #500 and #510 have a less roomy toe box and vamp than the #550. Additional the 500/510 (same boot different color) is unlined and single stitched. The 550 is leather lined (so warmer) more roomy, beefier heel cushioning, and double stitched so slightly more durable. The 500/510 is what most consider more svelte looking so if you are more concerned with fashion and outfit conscious or also want to wear the boot in the summer go with 500/510. If you are more about how the boots will work in the elements, shoulder season, durability and comfort then go with 550.
u/mattwheer/frugalmalefashionView thread →
558s performed perfectly during Scotland trip
I walked all over Scotland in April 2024 in 558's, and I had absolutely no regrets! At one point, I washed mud off of them in the hotel bathtub and they were just fine. I conditioned them when I got home and the leather still looked great. I always recommend smooth leather if you'll be walking in mud, so the 558's are a great option.
u/revolver_girlr/BlundstoneBootsView thread →